In a significant interim relief, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has put a temporary hold on criminal proceedings against Punjabi singer Guru Randhawa, who was accused of defaming the Jatt-Sikh community through lyrics in his 2025 track Sirra.
The order, passed on March 20, pauses the ongoing trial stemming from a complaint that challenges a specific line in the song. The lyric in question—interpreted by the complainant as suggesting that Jatt-Sikh children are exposed to opium at birth—has been described as derogatory and harmful to the community’s image.
Allegations Over Cultural and Religious Sensitivity
The complaint argues that the line distorts the traditional Sikh practice of “Gurthi,” a ceremonial first nourishment given to newborns, often associated with spiritual and cultural values rooted in the teachings of Guru Granth Sahib. It further claims the portrayal reduces the dignity of the Jatt-Sikh community by linking it to substance use from birth.
Based on these claims, charges were invoked under multiple provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), including those related to promoting enmity, defamation, and insulting religious beliefs.
Singer Cites Lack of Malicious Intent
Randhawa, in his petition before the High Court, denied any intent to offend. He stated that even before the complaint was formally filed, he had responded to a legal notice and assured that the lyric would be revised or removed. According to his plea, efforts were made to coordinate with digital platforms to address concerns, reflecting good faith on his part.
He also argued that the expression used in the song was colloquial and part of everyday Punjabi language, not a reference to religious doctrine. The petition emphasized that the term “gurthi” in the lyric was used in a cultural, informal sense rather than as a depiction of the sacred ritual.
Procedural Lapses Highlighted
A key argument presented by Randhawa’s legal team focused on procedural irregularities. It was contended that the trial court issued notice without first recording the complainant’s sworn statement, as required under Section 223 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). The plea maintained that this step is mandatory before initiating such proceedings.
Randhawa further stated that he had not been provided with any recorded statements from the complainant or witnesses, raising concerns over due process.
Defamation Claim Contested
On the issue of defamation, the singer argued that the lyric neither targets any individual nor aims to harm the reputation of a clearly identifiable group. The plea described the line as artistic and self-expressive, lacking the intent necessary to constitute a criminal offence.
Next Hearing Scheduled
The High Court has scheduled the matter for further hearing on July 16. Until then, the stay on trial proceedings will remain in effect, offering temporary relief to the artist amid the ongoing legal and cultural debate surrounding the song.
About Punjabi Mania News Network
Editorial team at Punjabi Mania. Passionate about bringing the latest updates from the Punjabi entertainment industry directly to you.
Sign in with Google
Discussion 0
Join the Conversation
Share your thoughts, reply to others, and become part of the community.